CO129-100 - Sir Robinson - 1864 [9] — Page 168

advanced by gon The Person in May

1863

q

Meer

but several

of these objections, so

Jersectuals urged,

inconsistent

of

which in recent

are

with

deepaliher

recent years,

and apparently with the

Concurrence of four

Council, have been for one

tion blime addressed

to

to this department

review

I will bricht The for storts which have been

advanced against the

Measure

1863

160

The first is that Troops are not necessary for the security of the Colony, that they are maintained for Imperial, & not Colonial Interests.

The first part of this statement appears to me to be at variance with the opinions of the Executive Council in June 1863, when it was thought necessary, at a time when there was hardly any cause for apprehension.

Any attack, ... to erect Batteries & ... recall ... then who

It appears that there are several OCR errors and formatting issues in the given text. Here's a corrected version in HTML format as per the instructions:

advanced by the Person in May

1863

Meer but several of these objections, so Jersectuals urged, inconsistent of which in recent are with deepaliher recent years, and apparently with the Concurrence of four Council, have been for one tion blime addressed to to this department for review.

I will bring forth the sorts which have been advanced against the Measure.

1863

160

The first is that Troops are not necessary for the security of the Colony, that they are maintained for Imperial, & not Colonial Interests.

The first part of this statement appears to me to be thoughly at variance with the opinions of the Executive Council in June 1863, when it was thought necessary, at a time when there was hardly any cause for apprehension.

Any attack, ... to erect / Batteries & ... recall ... then who

However, to better follow the instructions and improve readability, here is a more refined version:

Advanced by the Person in May 1863,

but several of these objections, so forcefully urged, are inconsistent with recent developments in recent years, and apparently with the concurrence of the Executive Council, have been addressed to this department for review.

I will bring forth the arguments which have been advanced against the measure of 1863.

160

The first is that troops are not necessary for the security of the Colony, that they are maintained for Imperial, and not Colonial, interests.

The first part of this statement appears to me to be at variance with the opinions of the Executive Council in June 1863, when it was thought necessary, at a time when there was hardly any cause for apprehension.

Any attack, ... to erect Batteries & ... recall ... then who

Given the original text's condition and the rules provided, the most accurate correction while maintaining the original content as much as possible is challenging due to the extent of OCR errors. The refined version aims to correct obvious errors while preserving the original tone and content.